Helpline: +91 94651-19900 | Email: [email protected]
We have seen many times that reputed brands directly attack their rivals while promoting their own products. The real question arises as to whether this constitutes a legal infringement of the trademark when they use their competitor’s name in advertisements…
In a significant legal victory, the Delhi High Court has handed down a permanent injunction against Renovision Exports Pvt. Ltd., prohibiting the use of the trademark “Vigoura” due to its infringement upon Pfizer’s renowned “Viagra.” Background Pfizer, a pharmaceutical giant,…
Dish TV cannot claim exclusive rights over the generic term ‘Dish’, Prasar Bharti wins the suit. Case Background Prasar Bharti, operating as Doordarshan, launched its DTH service under the name ‘DD Direct Plus’ in 2004, later rebranded as ‘DD Free…
Trademarks must be both distinctive and morally sound to uphold ethical standards. they represent values and legality. The recent ruling by the EU General Court denying the registration of the name “Pablo Escobar” as a European Union trademark raises complex…
Introduction: The digital revolution has brought online shopping to every nook and corner of India, from bustling cities to remote villages. Its surge in popularity can be attributed to its unparalleled convenience – enabling consumers to shop 24/7 from the…
Introduction The rapid expansion of the Internet has transformed various aspects of life, offering convenience and accessibility. However, this digital revolution has also given rise to cybercrime, posing significant challenges globally, including in India. This article explores the proactive measures…
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Chandigarh resolved a dispute involving a Maruti Suzuki dealership. Complainant filed a complaint against Autopace Network Private Limited, alleged a defective car was sold in pretext of brand new. Facts Parul Sud purchased…
Ensuring Fairness in Real Estate HARERA’s Landmark Ruling The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority recently ruled against builder for breaching consumer trust and engaging in fraudulent practices. The dispute arose from builder’s miscalculation of price of a property, stemming from…
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Central Mumbai has ruled against Flipkart for adopting unfair trade practices. The commission found Flipkart guilty of intentionally cancelling a customer’s iPhone order to make extra profit, causing mental harassment and agony to…
Commission decides case of Medical Negligence The Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission issued a ruling. The complainant alleged that despite holding only a homeopathic medicine degree, the homeopathy practitioner prescribed allopathic medicines to his wife. They must pay…